The draft political declaration on the future relationship between the EU and the UK after Brexit has been published. Theresa May describes it as the right deal for the UK. Again, it`s worth noting that this is not a legally binding document, so there`s no guarantee of what the world will look like after Brexit. In his interview with the BBC`s ANDREW Neil, Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage said: “The political statement that people say this is not legally binding; it really is. Because the treaty, once ratified, Article 184 makes it very clear that what is in the Political Declaration is legally binding. “The political declaration is not a treaty, there will be differences of interpretation on both sides, and the point we have made in recent days is that the EU cannot be the arbiter of this,” Mordaunt told parliament. The United Kingdom and the European Union agreed in October 2019 on the 31-page political declaration, which sets the direction for future negotiations. It is not legally binding. Expect it to work and function, as the UK is not alone in having a vocal fishing lobby with more political power than its overall contribution to the economy suggests. It`s not very long either, but it went from last week`s seven-page plan to 26 pages. It sits next to the 585-page draft Withdrawal Agreement (which will be legally binding once ratified).
The statement also explicitly mentions an “independent trade policy” for the UK in the future. Like the draft Withdrawal Agreement, the Political Declaration provides for a dispute settlement system involving a Joint Committee and an Arbitration Panel. Although the Declaration is not a legally binding instrument, it contains principles and rights based on human rights standards enshrined in other legally binding international instruments that are legally binding. Furthermore, the adoption of the Declaration by consensus by the General Assembly represents a very firm commitment by States to its implementation. LONDON (Reuters) – Britain said on Tuesday that the political declaration it had agreed with the European Union was not a treaty and that there were therefore differences of interpretation on the matter and that the bloc could not position itself as the ultimate judge of these differences. But this obscures the fact that there is still deep disagreement over fisheries and the search for the right balance between the access of British products to EU markets and the access of EU vessels to British fishing waters. The full name of the Declaration is “Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms”. However, it is often abbreviated as the “Declaration on Human Rights Defenders”. The UK hopes to be well positioned in the upcoming negotiations to reap the benefits of new technologies and the digital economy.
This fulfills the Prime Minister`s promise that the UK will regain control of its borders and that the free movement of EU citizens to the UK will end. But this means, of course, that the free movement of British citizens to the EU will also cease. British officials see this as a key phrase that suggests there is a lot of room for manoeuvre in the upcoming negotiations. Articles 3 and 4 describe the relationship of the Declaration with national and international law in order to ensure the application of the highest possible legal standards of human rights. And no one can say for sure how long it will take to negotiate. The government denies this, arguing that there is nothing wrong with wanting ambitious customs regulations in the future, including the need to avoid controls on so-called “rules of origin”. Cabinet joins Johnson over calls for resignation But the EU has already made it clear that the UK cannot expect to have the same access to all EU databases – in different economic and security sectors – as it would as an EU member state. Both sides commit to an “ambitious, far-reaching and balanced” economic partnership based on a comprehensive free trade agreement.
The Declaration provides for the support and protection of human rights defenders in the course of their work. It does not create new rights, but articulates existing rights in a way that makes them easier to apply to the practical role and situation of human rights defenders. It addresses, for example, access to funding by human rights defenders` organizations and the collection and exchange of information on human rights standards and their violations. The Declaration describes some specific obligations of States and the responsibilities of all in the defence of human rights, as well as an explanation of their relationship with national law. .